Thomas Gaston shows how intertextuality can help unravel knotty passages.
Earlier Christadelphians encouraged the use of the latest and best quality resources. Wilson's Diaglott has been out of date for more than 100 years. John Carter recommended a superior Greek interlinear, which was one of the best in his day but has since been superseded by more accurate texts.
Wilfred Lambert reminds us that good Bible students follow the evidence.
John Martin demonstrates the importance of background information. Notice the reference to assumed knowledge.
J. W. Thirtle turns to contemporary textual criticism for guidance on the variant readings of Matthew 6:33.
C. C. Walker's knowledge of sociohistorical context sheds light on the book of Job.
Gnosticism (from the Greek word gnōsis, meaning 'knowledge') was a mystical belief system that is still greatly misunderstood. Many errors regarding its origins and teachings are perpetuated to this day.
Gnosticism emerged from within the Christian community during the 2nd Century AD and is therefore a Christian heresy, not a pagan intruder.
There is no evidence of any pre-Christian Gnostic literature or oral tradition (Gnostic writings all date from the Christian era) and no belief system resembling Gnosticism in the 1st century AD.
Gnostics claimed to be heirs of secret traditions passed down from Jesus through a clandestine tradition.
One of their earliest leaders was a heretic called Valentinus. His followers said he had been taught by a fellow Gnostic called Theudas, whom they believed had been instructed by the apostle Paul.
Gnostic doctrine can be summarised as follows:
* There are two gods: an evil god and a good god
* The evil god is an imperfect deity called the Demiurge; it was he who created the material world
* The good god is called the Pleroma or Bythos; he is superior to the Demiurge in power and character, and too pure to interact with creation
* There are lesser divine beings (called Aeons) who emanate from the Pleroma; their role is unclear
* The material world is 'fallen', 'broken', 'evil', and irredeemable
* A tiny portion of the divine still resides in each of us and must be reawoken before it can return to its source; it is through this process that individuals achieve salvation
Some Gnostics taught that Jesus was an incarnation of the supreme God, come to offer salvation.
Others taught that Jesus was a false messiah.
Still others believed Jesus was merely human but achieved deity through gnōsis.
The Nicolaitans were a minor, short-lived heretical faction within the 1st century Christian community. Scripture mentions them only twice (Revelation 2:6, 15) and tells us nothing about their beliefs.
Their origins are unknown. There is absolutely no substance to the claim that the Nicolaitans were so called because they were 'conquerers of the people' (the meaning of 'Nicolaus'), or that their founder was Nicolaus of Antioch (Acts 6:5), or even that his name was Nicolaus at all.
Nicolaism was limited to the Turkish churches of Ephesus and Pergumum. The distance between them was considerable (~206km) and there is no mention of the heresy emerging in other local congregations (e.g. Smyrna). We can only speculate about the reasons why it failed to spread further.
What did the Nicolaitans teach? The paucity of biblical evidence makes it impossible to be sure, but their mention within the context of Balaam's error (Revelation 2:14) has led many to conclude that Nicolaism involved the indulgence of paganism and immortality.
Unlike Gnosticism (a 2nd century heresy of leater decades) there is no evidence that the Nicolaitans believed themselves to possess secret knowledge or superior wisdom. Indeed, there is no ideological or historical connection between these two groups whatsoever.